(this article appeared in e-magazine Business Trends Asia (www.businesstrendsasia.com)
On 8 December 2009, the Netherlands Council for Trade Promotion in associaton with the Netherlands-Thai Chamber of Commerce and the Netherlands-Vietnam Chamber of Commerce, will stage a Greater Mekong Subregion Seminar in the Dutch port city of Rotterdam.
Among the speakers at the Seminar are representatives from the Asian Development Bank, a key initiator and facilitator in the Greater Mekong Subregion (GMS), and engineering and construction companies, DHV and Royal Haskoning, both active players in the region.
Although Western companies have a significant presence in the region, in particular in Thailand and Vietnam, and to a lesser extent in Cambodia and Laos, Asian companies are by far the leading investors in the countries along the Mekong River. The US$5.9 billion Vietnam International Township project by Malaysian conglomerate Berjaya Land Berhad makes Malaysia the largest foreign investor in Vietnam, while Thailand and Vietnam are the largest foreign investors in Laos, mainly in tourism and hydropower projects. Also the Chinese are appearing more and more on the GMS investment scene. Recently, grants and low-interest loans for funding of the US$86.4 million expansion of the airport of Luang Prabang in Laos were underwritten by the Chinese government. Also, Chinese investors are eyeing several hotel development projects in the country.
The recent removal of Laos and Cambodia of a United States blacklist that limits government support for U.S. companies doing business with the two nations, in an effort to counterbalance the rising influence of China, will therefore have little impact on the investment landscape in Laos and Cambodia. With or without the U.S., the Greater Mekong Subregion, is facing a bright economic future.
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
Friday, October 30, 2009
Buddhism in the Thai workplace
Foreign employers and foreign managers in Thailand need to be aware of the extreme importance Buddhism has in the lives of all their employees.
Most Thai employees will express little outward religious fervour but this does not mean they feel indifferent towards their religion, even though most might break the Buddhist moral codes every day. Employers who neglect to observe the basic rules regarding Buddhist rites and obligations at the workfloor will face difficulties and sabotage.
The vast majority of the Thai people takes enormous pride in being Buddhist. This is not necessarily displayed openly and if one is not observant it might completely escape attention. Should that be the case then chances are high the Thai staff feel their foreign employer/manager is insensitive towards Thai religion and culture, straining professional relationships.
The Lord Buddha is revered above all else and the monks are His representatives on earth and are therefore at the pinnacle of society. Their position ranks even higher than that of the king. Even the least religious Thai will consider a negative attitude towards Buddha and the monkhood as an insult towards the entire Thai nation and its culture.
An extra element of Thai Buddhism is the fact that actually the majority of the Thai people is not Buddhist at all (although they would strongly deny this) but animist. Spirits have an extremely important place in every day life and will often reside inside Buddhist religious elements, thus blending the two perfectly.
A foreign manager can gain enormous face and goodwill if he/she will organize Buddhist rites almost immediately after taking up his/her position in Thailand. Some possibilities are:- Organize the visit of a prestigious monk or monks from a prestigious temple to the workplace for blessing of the operation. This requires some insider knowledge as not all monks or temples are considered equally good. To hire a monk or monks from a temple held in low esteem might create actual damage instead of creating goodwill. The reason is that literally every man can be ordained as a monk should he wish so, even the hardest criminals will be allowed to receive the blessings of monkhood. To unwittingly invite a monk of known disrepute will not create the anticipated goodwill.- Have a shrine established on the grounds of a new workplace.- All existing buildings will have a shrine on the grounds. Monks could be invited to conduct a cleaning ceremony or erect a new replacement. This should be handles with extreme care as the original shrine will be endowed with special powers and the residing spirits must be pacified first before the shrine be properly cleaned or replaced by a new one.- Organize a visit to a prestigious temple with the entire staff for merit making. This activity has the advantage of providing fun or “sanuk” in Thai, a necessary element in every Thai working environment.
Offices all have a small shrine attached high up on a wall with a little Buddha statue and some cups containing food and drink as offerings plus an incense holder. These will be refreshed every day. Foreigners are not expected to pay attention but they are certainly expected to allow the presence of the office shrine. Contrary to Thai offices Chinese companies will normally have a large shrine placed on the floor and besides a Buddha statue there will normally also be one Kuan Ying, the Goddess of Good Fortune. Keeping the shrine clean and foreseen with the daily refreshments is something office workers will organize by themselves. There is never a need for the foreign manager to become involved.
Almost every Thai man will enter the monkhood at some stage of his life. This is normally for a brief period of time: 3 days, one week, 3 weeks or 3 months. Most young men will become a monk as a symbolism to close one chapter of their life before entering another one. Becoming a monk prior to marriage is quite common. It can also be done as a means of honouring the parents. Employers must allow employees time off (with paid leave) to enter the monkhood for a specified period of time. Up to a maximum of three weeks is customary. It also needs to be granted only once. When an employee enters the monkhood it is common for the manager to be invited for the ceremony and the party afterwards (on which Thais will always spend enormous amounts of money as a son becoming a monk, no matter for how brief a period of time, is a tremendous auspicious occasion). Attendance is greatly appreciated and provides the employee concerned with face and the manager with respect.
Foreign employers and foreign managers cannot overestimate the sensitivity of Thais towards Buddhism. It is never expressed fanatically and foreigners are not expected to participate themselves but their possible failure to respect established Buddhist practices (e.g. allowing an office shrine etc.) will result in an immediate backlash. And, like the King, the Buddha can never be ridiculed, not even in a joking manner.
This article appeared earlier in e-magazine Business Trends Asia (www.businesstrendsasia.com)
Most Thai employees will express little outward religious fervour but this does not mean they feel indifferent towards their religion, even though most might break the Buddhist moral codes every day. Employers who neglect to observe the basic rules regarding Buddhist rites and obligations at the workfloor will face difficulties and sabotage.
The vast majority of the Thai people takes enormous pride in being Buddhist. This is not necessarily displayed openly and if one is not observant it might completely escape attention. Should that be the case then chances are high the Thai staff feel their foreign employer/manager is insensitive towards Thai religion and culture, straining professional relationships.
The Lord Buddha is revered above all else and the monks are His representatives on earth and are therefore at the pinnacle of society. Their position ranks even higher than that of the king. Even the least religious Thai will consider a negative attitude towards Buddha and the monkhood as an insult towards the entire Thai nation and its culture.
An extra element of Thai Buddhism is the fact that actually the majority of the Thai people is not Buddhist at all (although they would strongly deny this) but animist. Spirits have an extremely important place in every day life and will often reside inside Buddhist religious elements, thus blending the two perfectly.
A foreign manager can gain enormous face and goodwill if he/she will organize Buddhist rites almost immediately after taking up his/her position in Thailand. Some possibilities are:- Organize the visit of a prestigious monk or monks from a prestigious temple to the workplace for blessing of the operation. This requires some insider knowledge as not all monks or temples are considered equally good. To hire a monk or monks from a temple held in low esteem might create actual damage instead of creating goodwill. The reason is that literally every man can be ordained as a monk should he wish so, even the hardest criminals will be allowed to receive the blessings of monkhood. To unwittingly invite a monk of known disrepute will not create the anticipated goodwill.- Have a shrine established on the grounds of a new workplace.- All existing buildings will have a shrine on the grounds. Monks could be invited to conduct a cleaning ceremony or erect a new replacement. This should be handles with extreme care as the original shrine will be endowed with special powers and the residing spirits must be pacified first before the shrine be properly cleaned or replaced by a new one.- Organize a visit to a prestigious temple with the entire staff for merit making. This activity has the advantage of providing fun or “sanuk” in Thai, a necessary element in every Thai working environment.
Offices all have a small shrine attached high up on a wall with a little Buddha statue and some cups containing food and drink as offerings plus an incense holder. These will be refreshed every day. Foreigners are not expected to pay attention but they are certainly expected to allow the presence of the office shrine. Contrary to Thai offices Chinese companies will normally have a large shrine placed on the floor and besides a Buddha statue there will normally also be one Kuan Ying, the Goddess of Good Fortune. Keeping the shrine clean and foreseen with the daily refreshments is something office workers will organize by themselves. There is never a need for the foreign manager to become involved.
Almost every Thai man will enter the monkhood at some stage of his life. This is normally for a brief period of time: 3 days, one week, 3 weeks or 3 months. Most young men will become a monk as a symbolism to close one chapter of their life before entering another one. Becoming a monk prior to marriage is quite common. It can also be done as a means of honouring the parents. Employers must allow employees time off (with paid leave) to enter the monkhood for a specified period of time. Up to a maximum of three weeks is customary. It also needs to be granted only once. When an employee enters the monkhood it is common for the manager to be invited for the ceremony and the party afterwards (on which Thais will always spend enormous amounts of money as a son becoming a monk, no matter for how brief a period of time, is a tremendous auspicious occasion). Attendance is greatly appreciated and provides the employee concerned with face and the manager with respect.
Foreign employers and foreign managers cannot overestimate the sensitivity of Thais towards Buddhism. It is never expressed fanatically and foreigners are not expected to participate themselves but their possible failure to respect established Buddhist practices (e.g. allowing an office shrine etc.) will result in an immediate backlash. And, like the King, the Buddha can never be ridiculed, not even in a joking manner.
This article appeared earlier in e-magazine Business Trends Asia (www.businesstrendsasia.com)
Monday, October 19, 2009
Why China will not save the world
This article appeared earlier in e-magazine Business Trends Asia (www.businesstrendsasia.com)
Why China will not save the world
The "West" is trying to push China into the limelight as saviour of a world reeling from the chaos of the global financial crisis. However nothing in China's recorded history of almost 5,000 years points to a structural Chinese desire in a world outside its immediate cultural sphere of influence.
China’s recorded history of almost 5,000 years does not cover China as is known today. The nation state China with it’s current borders exists since 1950 (1949 conquering of all China by the Communists and 1950 the inclusion of Tibet). Before the fall of the last Imperial dynasty, the Qing, the current state of Mongolia was part of China as well for almost 400 years.
The largest territory once governed by China’s rulers was during the Yuan dynasty at the end of the 13th century AD when the country’s borders stretched across southeast Siberia and included the Korean peninsula besides most of the territory of modern day China.
For a large part of this 5,000 year recorded history China consisted of a number of fragmented independent states with constantly fluctuating borders. These Chinese states and dynasties where most of time located in the country’s eastern half. During certain periods (Yuan, Tang and Qing) China’s territory expanded westwards but shrank back again to the east when new rulers took over.
Some dynasties would open up China (or the territory they ruled of what is now called China) during some period of their rule e.g. the Tang (7th to10th century AD) and the early Ming (14th and 15th century AD) but for large periods of time the country was basically closed to foreigners. Under China’s last imperial dynasty, the Qing, its borders expanded westwards but foreigners remained unwelcome and the country was basically forced open in the 2nd half of the 19th century by the European world powers of that time.
When the communists took over China in 1949 the country was once again sealed off from the outside world. Only in 1978/1979 opened the government the doors again. The current state of open interaction with the world at large covers a mere 30-year period and cannot be considered as the “natural order of things”. Chinese society does not have a natural regard for other cultures and peoples as the current standard Cantonese word for Westerner still shows which is the negative Kwai Loh or Foreign Devil.
Chinese rulers have always been much more concerned with domestic policies and trying to maintain social stability as this has always proven to be China’s Achilles heel during the past few thousand years. The current authorities form no exception to this rule. Their first and foremost concern is how to prevent the current global economic crisis from damaging Chinese society and how to prevent social unrest and instability.
China’s authorities have never been concerned about the opinion of the outside world and never expressed a serious interest in the position of other countries. On the one hand it means China is not overly interested in overpowering neighbouring nations but on the other hand the country is hesitant to use its power and influence “for the greater good of mankind”.
China will stimulate its domestic market for the benefit of Chinese companies not foreign corporations and its manufacturers will continue to export their cheaper products around the globe. The exchange rate of the Yuan will reflect China’s needs not Europe’s or those of the USA.
A senior Chinese economic policy advisor has already raised the suggestion that the Chinese government should abandon the US-Dollar as its main foreign reserve currency. The fact that Chinese government officials dispelled this idea cannot be considered as a commitment to global cooperation and support of the US government and US economy. The real message lies in the circumstance that this senior economic adviser has been allowed to voice this opinion in public and on a world stage. This means that the Chinese government is actually contemplating this decision, that it will do what is in the best interest of China and will undertake the action which ensures internal social stability. How this will affect the world at large is of little importance.
A culturally deeply ingrained mistrust of foreigners and strangers in general, the pre-occupation of any Chinese government over the past few thousand years with maintaining internal social stability and their reflex to seal off the country when the domestic situation seems to spiral out of control are not characteristics of a globally engaged nation.
Why China will not save the world
The "West" is trying to push China into the limelight as saviour of a world reeling from the chaos of the global financial crisis. However nothing in China's recorded history of almost 5,000 years points to a structural Chinese desire in a world outside its immediate cultural sphere of influence.
China’s recorded history of almost 5,000 years does not cover China as is known today. The nation state China with it’s current borders exists since 1950 (1949 conquering of all China by the Communists and 1950 the inclusion of Tibet). Before the fall of the last Imperial dynasty, the Qing, the current state of Mongolia was part of China as well for almost 400 years.
The largest territory once governed by China’s rulers was during the Yuan dynasty at the end of the 13th century AD when the country’s borders stretched across southeast Siberia and included the Korean peninsula besides most of the territory of modern day China.
For a large part of this 5,000 year recorded history China consisted of a number of fragmented independent states with constantly fluctuating borders. These Chinese states and dynasties where most of time located in the country’s eastern half. During certain periods (Yuan, Tang and Qing) China’s territory expanded westwards but shrank back again to the east when new rulers took over.
Some dynasties would open up China (or the territory they ruled of what is now called China) during some period of their rule e.g. the Tang (7th to10th century AD) and the early Ming (14th and 15th century AD) but for large periods of time the country was basically closed to foreigners. Under China’s last imperial dynasty, the Qing, its borders expanded westwards but foreigners remained unwelcome and the country was basically forced open in the 2nd half of the 19th century by the European world powers of that time.
When the communists took over China in 1949 the country was once again sealed off from the outside world. Only in 1978/1979 opened the government the doors again. The current state of open interaction with the world at large covers a mere 30-year period and cannot be considered as the “natural order of things”. Chinese society does not have a natural regard for other cultures and peoples as the current standard Cantonese word for Westerner still shows which is the negative Kwai Loh or Foreign Devil.
Chinese rulers have always been much more concerned with domestic policies and trying to maintain social stability as this has always proven to be China’s Achilles heel during the past few thousand years. The current authorities form no exception to this rule. Their first and foremost concern is how to prevent the current global economic crisis from damaging Chinese society and how to prevent social unrest and instability.
China’s authorities have never been concerned about the opinion of the outside world and never expressed a serious interest in the position of other countries. On the one hand it means China is not overly interested in overpowering neighbouring nations but on the other hand the country is hesitant to use its power and influence “for the greater good of mankind”.
China will stimulate its domestic market for the benefit of Chinese companies not foreign corporations and its manufacturers will continue to export their cheaper products around the globe. The exchange rate of the Yuan will reflect China’s needs not Europe’s or those of the USA.
A senior Chinese economic policy advisor has already raised the suggestion that the Chinese government should abandon the US-Dollar as its main foreign reserve currency. The fact that Chinese government officials dispelled this idea cannot be considered as a commitment to global cooperation and support of the US government and US economy. The real message lies in the circumstance that this senior economic adviser has been allowed to voice this opinion in public and on a world stage. This means that the Chinese government is actually contemplating this decision, that it will do what is in the best interest of China and will undertake the action which ensures internal social stability. How this will affect the world at large is of little importance.
A culturally deeply ingrained mistrust of foreigners and strangers in general, the pre-occupation of any Chinese government over the past few thousand years with maintaining internal social stability and their reflex to seal off the country when the domestic situation seems to spiral out of control are not characteristics of a globally engaged nation.
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
How to prepare your market entry ?
Recently, I published this report in e-weekly Business Trends Asia (http://www.businesstrendsasia.com/). Please, react.
How to prepare your market entry ?
Introduction
Before companies decide to expand into international markets normally their home market position is strong and healthy. It´s a market they know well and know how to operate successfully in. The (business) culture is their own so they’re not confronted with “surprising” behaviour and attitudes from staff and customers. Self-confidence and a strong home market position lead to the question why international expansion could not be successful?
Companies who already have expanded into international markets and have a career development programme in place will send high performing / high potential employees to take on an assignment in their international offices. Staff with good to excellent track records is rewarded with well-paid international positions.Companies that expand into international markets for the first time will use the elements of their success on their home market as the basis for their international expansion.Companies that are already internationally active will reward well-performing employees with an international posting.
International expansion and careers
When companies expand internationally for the first time management and staff guiding the expansion process will of course perform market investigations to the best of their abilities. Market research encompassing the statistical chances and growth opportunities will be investigated. Figures and other hard data will be collected as much as possible and evaluated.
These hard data will justify the actual expansion and required investments. The actual –human- approach of the new international market will be based on experiences gained on the home market. Where a lot of energy and effort will be put in the collection and evaluation of hard data the so-called “soft” side of the operation is in most cases completely ignored. The standard attitude is one of cultural self- centeredness. The home culture is deemed to be universally applicable and correct.
The attitude believing one’s own culture as the international standard of what is considered “normal” and of not being able to place other cultures at the same level is a universal human trait and difficult to replace with a more “open” approach of different values. And this is where the operation normally runs into difficulties.
It may seem like an open door but business is conducted between people and not companies. Successful business is therefore the result of successful interaction between individuals. People with different cultural backgrounds will evaluate the same situation with different views which might lead to completely opposite and conflicting conclusions. These hurdles are real and will affect the outcome of a business venture negatively if not recognized and addressed properly.
Companies who venture across their own borders for the first time need to spend just as much time and devote the same level of energy in properly evaluating the different (business) etiquettes of the country they want to be active in as they do in gathering and evaluating hard statistical data concerning their business opportunities.
Companies who are already active internationally run the risk of falling into the same ethno-centric trap. Multinational companies tend to send employees on international assignments and longer term stay as a reward for previous good performance and/or based on a specific set of professional skills rather than determining if the specific person is capable of successful intercultural interaction. Whereas the employee might be able to operate successfully in his/her own cultural environment this does not mean that the same set of professional skills will be sufficient to be effective in a different culture.
Staff from head office sent out to work in the international branches tend to believe local staff lack the level of technical skills they posses themselves and have a tendency to duplicate the work of their local employees to suit their own cultural perception of what constitutes a job well done. Local staff views this as cultural arrogance which can result in an uncooperative attitude. Foreign management members should accept that local staff probably posses the same set of professional skills as they have themselves and that giving priority to their own approach might backfire no matter how well intended.
Asian outlook
Within Europe even neighbouring countries, no matter how small, differ greatly in their cultural values and approach to life and business. In the Americas, Canada, the USA and Mexico to name just a few, each have a completely different cultural outlook on life. Within the USA individual states have their own unique set of values. And in Australia people from Brisbane, Sydney, Melbourne, Adelaide and Perth approach similar matters with different attitudes.
If cultural differences already appear between neighbouring countries or even within own borders then this is even more so the case between nations and peoples from different continents. And just as the USA cannot be considered as one homogenous entity the same is true for Asian giants like China, India and Indonesia.
The brash and aggressive attitude that is acceptable in Bangalore might be totally misplaced in more genteel Delhi. The Indonesian business elite might reside in the modern office towers on Sudirman Ave. in Jakarta but oil fields are located in rural Riau on Sumatra and most of the country’s mineral reserves are found on Irian Jaya where the population still largely lives in the Stone Age, is hostile towards outside interference and an impenetrable jungle makes local infrastructure almost impossible.Also in smaller countries different ethnic and /or religious groups might require a different approach whether as a partner, supplier or customer/consumer. In the Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand ethnic groups like the indigenous population, ethnic-Chinese and Indians live side by side but in most cases separately. Even in Thailand where assimilation of all ethnic groups has progressed farthest clear distinctions remain.
What might be considered a compliment e.g. a positive comment on the democratic process of Indonesia for one group (ethnic-Javanese) can be viewed as totally ridiculous by another group (e.g. the ethnic-Chinese in Indonesia). Where especially ethnic-Javanese would accuse their ethnic-Chinese countrymen of disloyalty towards the state of Indonesia, the ethnic-Chinese in turn would counter that their persecution by the ethnic-Indonesians does not warrant loyalty.
Operating inside an ethnically very sensitive society like Malaysia will require different approaches towards the main different ethnic communities: Malay, Chinese and Indian. Political tension can easily spill over into daily life.
Where across the Southeast Asian region as a broad generalization the indigenous population can be considered more open towards outsiders, the local ethnic-Chinese and Indian communities remain very much suspicious of outside developments and tend to rely exclusively on support networks within their own (international) communities. When dealing with an indigenous organization establishing the right hierarchal structure might be crucial whereas dealing with an ethnic-Chinese or Indian organization might require eliminating high levels of initial suspicion.These differences matter. They need to be taken into account, studied and evaluated. When operating in a culturally completely different environment it is important to reflect on one’s own culture vs. the culture one is operating in.
Examples
1) Toys
Increasing incomes means more disposable income of course and in general Asians crave the same things as Westerners. When parents earn more money they will spend more on their children, especially in Asian cultures. And all children like toys, right?Gift giving occasions are a Western cultural phenomenon. Receiving toys and other presents at birthdays and Christmas is something Western children see as the natural order of the universe but is completely alien to Asian children. When Asian children receive presents during festive occasions e.g. Diwali, Eid al Fitr, and Chinese New Year these come in the form of new clothes and shoes, cake and candy, not toys.In South and Southeast Asia daily temperatures are simply too high to remain indoors in case airconditioning is not available. For playing outdoors very simple toys like plastic water guns will suffice. Lego, miniature train sets etc. are all unwanted.
Where airconditioning penetration among common households is increasing like Malaysia and Thailand or is already the norm as in Singapore, children jump immediately from no toys at all to sophisticated computer games skipping the phase of traditional toys.
Toy stores in South and Southeast Asia are only few in numbers and cater mostly to an expat Western clientele. Just because parents have more money and their children are more familiar with what happens in the outside world does not make them automatically crave traditional Western toys.
2) Financial services
In general Europeans, Americans, Australians are familiar with long-term saving concepts like pension schemes or private financial programmes. Running periods range from 15 to 35 years. In China, India and Southeast Asia such savings concepts are completely new. Pensions are traditionally only available to civil servants, the police force and the military. Old age care in general comes in the form of offspring who take care of their parents when they are too old to work. Instead of a safety net provided by social services and personal savings programmes siblings support each other and their parents financially when necessary or for business opportunities or educational purposes etc. Financial resources are actually pulled together when necessary thus allowing each member access to a greater financial support system when required.
International finance companies seeking new markets for their Western market- orientated savings programmes need to accept that Asians have completely different savings objectives and therefore a different savings horizon. It’s not enough to study GDP growth figures or to determine that savings programmes do not exist in most Asian countries and that a growing middle-class should need these.Saving money is in general not an Asian feature. Money can buy things, even for long- term investments like gold, land and real estate. But actually saving money in the bank every month for 15 years or longer for retirement or other purposes is unheard of. Besides, how would a consumer know if the bank where she puts her money is safe and reliable and will not collapse and steal all her hard-earned savings? In many countries local banks do not yet have a solid enough reputation that would allow them to attract long-term savings. Savings programmes need to cater to local needs and customs and should have much shorter running periods.
3) Growth and decline
GDP growth figures of 8% to 12% of countries like India, China but also Singapore have to be analyzed carefully. There is always a catch or at least a hidden story behind these figures.China’s massive economic growth of the last decade has been concentrated in selected parts of the country like Guangzhou, Shanghai and Beijing-Tianjin. It’s not that 1.3 billion Chinese have suddenly all been lifted out of poverty.
India’s growth spurt is more recent although no less impressive. High tech developments in cities like Bangalore, Pune and Hyderabad make international headlines. India’s BPO industry is world-famous. But over 70% of India’s population lives in the countryside and a staggering 76 million households or 400 million people (36.4% of the total Indian population) still have no electricity. It’s not that 1.1 billion Indians suddenly will all buy mobile phones. If you have no electricity how will you recharge the battery?Singapore is a prime example of excellent planning and modern city life. But with a GDP level matching or surpassing West European levels economic growth figures of up to 8% as was reported in the period 2005-2008 is simply not possible without completely overheating the economy. Singapore’s economic growth of this period was solely caused by the rapid development of certain specialized very high-tech industries creating a lot of added value such as biomedicine and medical tourism plus the specialized construction required for these types of industries.
Due to the relatively limited size of Singapore’s economy (approximately €100 billion annually) growth of this new and high value-added industries within a short period of time to over €9.0 billion annually with an added-value of €4.6 billion meant a massive contribution to the country’s overall GDP growth. But due to its specialized nature this did not mean that other sectors of the economy did equally well. General retail, tourism, services etc. did not realize similar growth levels. It was not as if all Singaporeans from scientists to taxi drivers experienced a massive income growth during the growth years.Now that initial investments in the biomedical and medical tourism sectors have been finalized and no need exists for immediate massive new investments the growth in these sectors of the economy has temporarily levelled off. Now other sectors experience a slow down due to the global economic crisis official GDP figures released by the Singapore government show a contraction of 5 -10% . If real it would mean a near collapse of the country’s economy. But just like the economic growth figures affected a certain specialized segment of the economy so is the decline also not a country-wide phenomenon. The financial services industry and retail are taking a hit due to less consumer confidence but other sectors of the economy are keeping up.
Success
Western companies with a successful presence in Asia all have an excellent local network in common. This can have been built up over the decades and even dating back to colonial times like Shell, Unilever, FrieslandCampina Dairy or the Borneo Trading Company or relatively recently. Examples include the Minor Group in Thailand (est. 1967) owned by American Bill Heinecke or the East West Seed Company in the Philippines and with branches in Thailand, Vietnam and Indonesia (est. 1982) and co-owned by Dutchman Simon Groot.
Local partners are crucial to the success of a Western company in Asia. Bad ones will prevent any effort from bearing fruit, no matter how much money, work, attention and energy is contributed. But good ones can take a company to unexpected heights. Eventually this will lead to independence from the local partner and a full integration into the local society.
Besides a local network and/or strong local partner, successful Western companies offer products and services that tailor to the local market needs. This seems also an open door but many companies fail to recognize this and offer standard products developed for their own home market or following only international standards.
Another success factor is recognizing local trade structures and economic realities. An example is the popularity of flavoured yoghurt in small single-use cups in Thailand. Dairy products in general are not part of the traditional Thai diet. Yoghurt is a specialized product with a distinct taste that is popular in India, the Middle East and Europe but completely unknown in Southeast Asia until 20 years ago.
In the beginning of the 1990s, FrieslandCampina Dairy (in Thailand known as Foremost) with a local presence dating back to before WWII, started to promote its flavoured yoghurt products. Part of its strategy was to focus on the countryside where it organized a network of independent (female) door-to-door sales people who came from within the local communities. As these people were known and trusted they were able to persuade the local population to sample some products and when they enjoyed the flavour buy 1 or a few cups. Within 2 years this had led to a wide acceptance of yoghurt products in the Thai countryside. The sweet taste of the flavours suited Thai taste buds for dairy products and the small portions made them affordable for all income groups.
A third success factor lies in trusting, respecting and valuing local staff. Just because they might not be able to speak English well, might prefer rice to bread for breakfast or act differently when confronted with challenges does not mean they are uneducated, incompetent or disloyal.
A Western, Japanese or Korean company also has an advantage local companies lack: they normally attract the better educated, more ambitious, more assertive people. Staff working for foreign companies in Asia in general tend to stick out from the pack, even where it concerns lower-level functions like drivers, messengers or cleaning staff. These employees know they receive higher wages than average and get more opportunities than their counterparts in local companies. They also realize their foreign employer is more demanding than a local one but this combination of challenge, opportunities and better pay suits them and when treated well local staff can display enormous loyalty. Such staff, when nourished and respected, will open up many opportunities for their foreign employers.
Conclusion
Success factors for international expansion are straightforward but not always easy to implement. When evaluating chances in a foreign market, study cultural aspects just as thouroughly as the hard data. When sending staff abroad not only take their technical skills into consideration but also their ability to function successfully in a culturally completely different environment. Make what might seem a disproportionate effort of selecting the right local partner(s). Hire local staff selectively and trust them and respect their own professionalism. Accept that the foreign culture is no less than one’s own and has the same value. Be able to put the different culture at the same level as one’s own and not secretly believe one’s own cultural values are of a higher standard. They’re just different, not higher. Accept local economic realities and make use of local trade structures rather than trying to force one’s own concept of what reality should be on an organization that will be unable to operate successfully with unrealistic policies.
How to prepare your market entry ?
Introduction
Before companies decide to expand into international markets normally their home market position is strong and healthy. It´s a market they know well and know how to operate successfully in. The (business) culture is their own so they’re not confronted with “surprising” behaviour and attitudes from staff and customers. Self-confidence and a strong home market position lead to the question why international expansion could not be successful?
Companies who already have expanded into international markets and have a career development programme in place will send high performing / high potential employees to take on an assignment in their international offices. Staff with good to excellent track records is rewarded with well-paid international positions.Companies that expand into international markets for the first time will use the elements of their success on their home market as the basis for their international expansion.Companies that are already internationally active will reward well-performing employees with an international posting.
International expansion and careers
When companies expand internationally for the first time management and staff guiding the expansion process will of course perform market investigations to the best of their abilities. Market research encompassing the statistical chances and growth opportunities will be investigated. Figures and other hard data will be collected as much as possible and evaluated.
These hard data will justify the actual expansion and required investments. The actual –human- approach of the new international market will be based on experiences gained on the home market. Where a lot of energy and effort will be put in the collection and evaluation of hard data the so-called “soft” side of the operation is in most cases completely ignored. The standard attitude is one of cultural self- centeredness. The home culture is deemed to be universally applicable and correct.
The attitude believing one’s own culture as the international standard of what is considered “normal” and of not being able to place other cultures at the same level is a universal human trait and difficult to replace with a more “open” approach of different values. And this is where the operation normally runs into difficulties.
It may seem like an open door but business is conducted between people and not companies. Successful business is therefore the result of successful interaction between individuals. People with different cultural backgrounds will evaluate the same situation with different views which might lead to completely opposite and conflicting conclusions. These hurdles are real and will affect the outcome of a business venture negatively if not recognized and addressed properly.
Companies who venture across their own borders for the first time need to spend just as much time and devote the same level of energy in properly evaluating the different (business) etiquettes of the country they want to be active in as they do in gathering and evaluating hard statistical data concerning their business opportunities.
Companies who are already active internationally run the risk of falling into the same ethno-centric trap. Multinational companies tend to send employees on international assignments and longer term stay as a reward for previous good performance and/or based on a specific set of professional skills rather than determining if the specific person is capable of successful intercultural interaction. Whereas the employee might be able to operate successfully in his/her own cultural environment this does not mean that the same set of professional skills will be sufficient to be effective in a different culture.
Staff from head office sent out to work in the international branches tend to believe local staff lack the level of technical skills they posses themselves and have a tendency to duplicate the work of their local employees to suit their own cultural perception of what constitutes a job well done. Local staff views this as cultural arrogance which can result in an uncooperative attitude. Foreign management members should accept that local staff probably posses the same set of professional skills as they have themselves and that giving priority to their own approach might backfire no matter how well intended.
Asian outlook
Within Europe even neighbouring countries, no matter how small, differ greatly in their cultural values and approach to life and business. In the Americas, Canada, the USA and Mexico to name just a few, each have a completely different cultural outlook on life. Within the USA individual states have their own unique set of values. And in Australia people from Brisbane, Sydney, Melbourne, Adelaide and Perth approach similar matters with different attitudes.
If cultural differences already appear between neighbouring countries or even within own borders then this is even more so the case between nations and peoples from different continents. And just as the USA cannot be considered as one homogenous entity the same is true for Asian giants like China, India and Indonesia.
The brash and aggressive attitude that is acceptable in Bangalore might be totally misplaced in more genteel Delhi. The Indonesian business elite might reside in the modern office towers on Sudirman Ave. in Jakarta but oil fields are located in rural Riau on Sumatra and most of the country’s mineral reserves are found on Irian Jaya where the population still largely lives in the Stone Age, is hostile towards outside interference and an impenetrable jungle makes local infrastructure almost impossible.Also in smaller countries different ethnic and /or religious groups might require a different approach whether as a partner, supplier or customer/consumer. In the Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand ethnic groups like the indigenous population, ethnic-Chinese and Indians live side by side but in most cases separately. Even in Thailand where assimilation of all ethnic groups has progressed farthest clear distinctions remain.
What might be considered a compliment e.g. a positive comment on the democratic process of Indonesia for one group (ethnic-Javanese) can be viewed as totally ridiculous by another group (e.g. the ethnic-Chinese in Indonesia). Where especially ethnic-Javanese would accuse their ethnic-Chinese countrymen of disloyalty towards the state of Indonesia, the ethnic-Chinese in turn would counter that their persecution by the ethnic-Indonesians does not warrant loyalty.
Operating inside an ethnically very sensitive society like Malaysia will require different approaches towards the main different ethnic communities: Malay, Chinese and Indian. Political tension can easily spill over into daily life.
Where across the Southeast Asian region as a broad generalization the indigenous population can be considered more open towards outsiders, the local ethnic-Chinese and Indian communities remain very much suspicious of outside developments and tend to rely exclusively on support networks within their own (international) communities. When dealing with an indigenous organization establishing the right hierarchal structure might be crucial whereas dealing with an ethnic-Chinese or Indian organization might require eliminating high levels of initial suspicion.These differences matter. They need to be taken into account, studied and evaluated. When operating in a culturally completely different environment it is important to reflect on one’s own culture vs. the culture one is operating in.
Examples
1) Toys
Increasing incomes means more disposable income of course and in general Asians crave the same things as Westerners. When parents earn more money they will spend more on their children, especially in Asian cultures. And all children like toys, right?Gift giving occasions are a Western cultural phenomenon. Receiving toys and other presents at birthdays and Christmas is something Western children see as the natural order of the universe but is completely alien to Asian children. When Asian children receive presents during festive occasions e.g. Diwali, Eid al Fitr, and Chinese New Year these come in the form of new clothes and shoes, cake and candy, not toys.In South and Southeast Asia daily temperatures are simply too high to remain indoors in case airconditioning is not available. For playing outdoors very simple toys like plastic water guns will suffice. Lego, miniature train sets etc. are all unwanted.
Where airconditioning penetration among common households is increasing like Malaysia and Thailand or is already the norm as in Singapore, children jump immediately from no toys at all to sophisticated computer games skipping the phase of traditional toys.
Toy stores in South and Southeast Asia are only few in numbers and cater mostly to an expat Western clientele. Just because parents have more money and their children are more familiar with what happens in the outside world does not make them automatically crave traditional Western toys.
2) Financial services
In general Europeans, Americans, Australians are familiar with long-term saving concepts like pension schemes or private financial programmes. Running periods range from 15 to 35 years. In China, India and Southeast Asia such savings concepts are completely new. Pensions are traditionally only available to civil servants, the police force and the military. Old age care in general comes in the form of offspring who take care of their parents when they are too old to work. Instead of a safety net provided by social services and personal savings programmes siblings support each other and their parents financially when necessary or for business opportunities or educational purposes etc. Financial resources are actually pulled together when necessary thus allowing each member access to a greater financial support system when required.
International finance companies seeking new markets for their Western market- orientated savings programmes need to accept that Asians have completely different savings objectives and therefore a different savings horizon. It’s not enough to study GDP growth figures or to determine that savings programmes do not exist in most Asian countries and that a growing middle-class should need these.Saving money is in general not an Asian feature. Money can buy things, even for long- term investments like gold, land and real estate. But actually saving money in the bank every month for 15 years or longer for retirement or other purposes is unheard of. Besides, how would a consumer know if the bank where she puts her money is safe and reliable and will not collapse and steal all her hard-earned savings? In many countries local banks do not yet have a solid enough reputation that would allow them to attract long-term savings. Savings programmes need to cater to local needs and customs and should have much shorter running periods.
3) Growth and decline
GDP growth figures of 8% to 12% of countries like India, China but also Singapore have to be analyzed carefully. There is always a catch or at least a hidden story behind these figures.China’s massive economic growth of the last decade has been concentrated in selected parts of the country like Guangzhou, Shanghai and Beijing-Tianjin. It’s not that 1.3 billion Chinese have suddenly all been lifted out of poverty.
India’s growth spurt is more recent although no less impressive. High tech developments in cities like Bangalore, Pune and Hyderabad make international headlines. India’s BPO industry is world-famous. But over 70% of India’s population lives in the countryside and a staggering 76 million households or 400 million people (36.4% of the total Indian population) still have no electricity. It’s not that 1.1 billion Indians suddenly will all buy mobile phones. If you have no electricity how will you recharge the battery?Singapore is a prime example of excellent planning and modern city life. But with a GDP level matching or surpassing West European levels economic growth figures of up to 8% as was reported in the period 2005-2008 is simply not possible without completely overheating the economy. Singapore’s economic growth of this period was solely caused by the rapid development of certain specialized very high-tech industries creating a lot of added value such as biomedicine and medical tourism plus the specialized construction required for these types of industries.
Due to the relatively limited size of Singapore’s economy (approximately €100 billion annually) growth of this new and high value-added industries within a short period of time to over €9.0 billion annually with an added-value of €4.6 billion meant a massive contribution to the country’s overall GDP growth. But due to its specialized nature this did not mean that other sectors of the economy did equally well. General retail, tourism, services etc. did not realize similar growth levels. It was not as if all Singaporeans from scientists to taxi drivers experienced a massive income growth during the growth years.Now that initial investments in the biomedical and medical tourism sectors have been finalized and no need exists for immediate massive new investments the growth in these sectors of the economy has temporarily levelled off. Now other sectors experience a slow down due to the global economic crisis official GDP figures released by the Singapore government show a contraction of 5 -10% . If real it would mean a near collapse of the country’s economy. But just like the economic growth figures affected a certain specialized segment of the economy so is the decline also not a country-wide phenomenon. The financial services industry and retail are taking a hit due to less consumer confidence but other sectors of the economy are keeping up.
Success
Western companies with a successful presence in Asia all have an excellent local network in common. This can have been built up over the decades and even dating back to colonial times like Shell, Unilever, FrieslandCampina Dairy or the Borneo Trading Company or relatively recently. Examples include the Minor Group in Thailand (est. 1967) owned by American Bill Heinecke or the East West Seed Company in the Philippines and with branches in Thailand, Vietnam and Indonesia (est. 1982) and co-owned by Dutchman Simon Groot.
Local partners are crucial to the success of a Western company in Asia. Bad ones will prevent any effort from bearing fruit, no matter how much money, work, attention and energy is contributed. But good ones can take a company to unexpected heights. Eventually this will lead to independence from the local partner and a full integration into the local society.
Besides a local network and/or strong local partner, successful Western companies offer products and services that tailor to the local market needs. This seems also an open door but many companies fail to recognize this and offer standard products developed for their own home market or following only international standards.
Another success factor is recognizing local trade structures and economic realities. An example is the popularity of flavoured yoghurt in small single-use cups in Thailand. Dairy products in general are not part of the traditional Thai diet. Yoghurt is a specialized product with a distinct taste that is popular in India, the Middle East and Europe but completely unknown in Southeast Asia until 20 years ago.
In the beginning of the 1990s, FrieslandCampina Dairy (in Thailand known as Foremost) with a local presence dating back to before WWII, started to promote its flavoured yoghurt products. Part of its strategy was to focus on the countryside where it organized a network of independent (female) door-to-door sales people who came from within the local communities. As these people were known and trusted they were able to persuade the local population to sample some products and when they enjoyed the flavour buy 1 or a few cups. Within 2 years this had led to a wide acceptance of yoghurt products in the Thai countryside. The sweet taste of the flavours suited Thai taste buds for dairy products and the small portions made them affordable for all income groups.
A third success factor lies in trusting, respecting and valuing local staff. Just because they might not be able to speak English well, might prefer rice to bread for breakfast or act differently when confronted with challenges does not mean they are uneducated, incompetent or disloyal.
A Western, Japanese or Korean company also has an advantage local companies lack: they normally attract the better educated, more ambitious, more assertive people. Staff working for foreign companies in Asia in general tend to stick out from the pack, even where it concerns lower-level functions like drivers, messengers or cleaning staff. These employees know they receive higher wages than average and get more opportunities than their counterparts in local companies. They also realize their foreign employer is more demanding than a local one but this combination of challenge, opportunities and better pay suits them and when treated well local staff can display enormous loyalty. Such staff, when nourished and respected, will open up many opportunities for their foreign employers.
Conclusion
Success factors for international expansion are straightforward but not always easy to implement. When evaluating chances in a foreign market, study cultural aspects just as thouroughly as the hard data. When sending staff abroad not only take their technical skills into consideration but also their ability to function successfully in a culturally completely different environment. Make what might seem a disproportionate effort of selecting the right local partner(s). Hire local staff selectively and trust them and respect their own professionalism. Accept that the foreign culture is no less than one’s own and has the same value. Be able to put the different culture at the same level as one’s own and not secretly believe one’s own cultural values are of a higher standard. They’re just different, not higher. Accept local economic realities and make use of local trade structures rather than trying to force one’s own concept of what reality should be on an organization that will be unable to operate successfully with unrealistic policies.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)